| |
FC0074 c-Myc
- Bin1 SH3 domain
Biological function The c-Myc oncoprotein (Myc) is a transcription factor that regulates a wealth of genes involved in a wide-variety of biological
activities including apoptosis, differentiation as well as proliferation. As a critical regulator of both normal and tumor cells,
Myc is
highly controlled at many levels and is at the center of an extensive interactome.
Domain organization/sequence features The N-terminal transactivation domain of Myc (Myc TAD, residues 1–143;) is essential for Myc-mediated transformation,
differentiation and apoptosis. This region serves as an interaction platform for proteins involved in chromatin and histone
modification as well as ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. TAD also controls protein expression through mRNA
translation as well as direct regulation of DNA replication.
Interactions with Myc homology box I (MBI, residues 47–63) govern the cellular stability of the protein thereby setting a time
window for its activity, whereas Myc homology box II (MBII, residues 128–143) coordinates interactions with the transcriptional
regulatory machinery.
Structural evidence Myc occupies a very heterogeneous conformational space, transiently structured regions can be found in residues 22–33 and in
the Myc homology box I (MBI; residues 45–65); both these regions are conserved in other members of the Myc family.
Binding of Bin1 to Myc-1–88 as assayed by NMR and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) revealed primary binding to the S62
region in a dynamically disordered and multivalent complex, accompanied by population shifts leading to altered
intramolecular conformational dynamics.
Dynamic properties of Myc-1–88 on a rapid time scale (ps–ns) were studied in the absence and presence of ligand binding.
Binding maintains overall intrinsic disorder in Myc-1–88 with no large-scale evidence for stable structure in the complex.
Residues in the more flexible middle and C-terminal region show very minor or insignificant differences between bound and
free forms. For residues 1–30, 49–56 and 61–82 in the transiently ordered segments of the bound form compared to the free
state suggest that fewer long-range interactions are sampled by these regions in the conformational ensemble of the
disordered protein domain.
Biochemical evidence Myc-1–88 may harbor two binding sites for Bin1–SH3 with different affinities. KDs of 33μM and 200μM, with
kon/koff of 590 M-1s-1/0.019 s-1 and 6.7 M-
1s-1/0.0013 s-1 .
In aggressive lymphomas, mutations at or near T58, which disturb its phosphorylation, lead to accumulation and retention of
Myc in its activated, S62-phosphorylated state. the affinity of unphosphorylated Myc-55–68 for Bin1– SH3 was significant
(KD 4.2 μM), and unaltered by phosphorylation on T58, the same peptide phosphorylated at S62 was unable to
bind Bin1–SH3 even at micromolar concentrations. Bin1 binding could retain Myc in its S62-unphosphorylated, inactive state,
which is indirectly supported by liberated Myc cell proliferative activity when Bin1 expression is inhibited by the adenovirus
E1A oncoprotein.
Structure/Mechanism No folding-on-binding occurs in Myc-1–88 when it binds Bin1–SH3; instead disorder is maintained throughout Myc-1–88, also
within transiently structured regions. In fact, dynamics on the millisecond level is even increased for Myc-1–88 as a whole in
complex with Bin1– SH3. Binding to the previously identified Bin1–SH3 site, centered on P59–P60–L61–S62–P63, is indeed
observed by small CSPs and localized small changes in dynamics, but these effects are not limited to the Bin1–SH3 binding
site, and do not result in stabilized secondary structure or conformational restriction at the binding site or anywhere else in
Myc-1–88.
In addition, multivalent Bin1 binding appears to affect significantly larger regions of Myc than those directly targeted by Bin1–
SH3 binding. Bin1–SH3 binding disrupts transient interactions involving these segments. The condensed ensemble is likely
stabilized by electrostatic interactions the Myc-1–49 region is predominantly negatively charged with a pI of 3.5, while the pI
of Myc-50–88 is 9.2. Multivalent Bin1–SH3 binding to Myc-1–88 hinders the formation of such intramolecular interactions
resulting in a shift in the conformational ensemble toward less compact states, retaining local dynamics on the ps-ms time
scale.
In the free state, fluctuating secondary structure elements in Myc residues 22–33 and 48–68, as well as adjacent conserved
hydrophobic clusters at residues 71–81 and 5– 15 loosely interact, thus shifting the population in the conformational
ensemble toward more compactly disordered condensed states
Mechanism category Tethering, Competitive binding
Posttranslational modification Myc-1–88, where hierarchical phosphorylation of S62 and T58 regulates activation and destruction of the Myc protein. Myc has
a short protein half-life of 20–30min, which is largely controlled through phosphorylation of T58 and S62. While phosphorylation
at S62 by ERK or CDK kinases is critical for Myc transforming ability and transiently increases Myc cellular stability, subsequent
phosphorylation of T58 by GSK3b triggers dephosphorylation of S62 by protein phosphatase 2 A (PP2A) and subsequent
ubiquitin-mediated degradation through SCF-Fbwx7.
Significance Fuzziness and complex dynamics in Myc together with multivalent interactions within Myc-1–88 and between Myc-1–88 and
Bin1–SH3 may be critical for achieving rapid yet accurate response to cellular signals in gene regulation. The underlying role of
the dynamics of Myc-1–88 both in isolation and in its multivalent complex with Bin1–SH3 could be to prevent stable binding to
its critical regulatory interaction sites.
Medical relevance Overexpression of c-Myc is associated with many human cancers. In aggressive lymphomas, c-Myc lifetime is prolonged owing to
decreased/hampered T58 phosphorylation. Regulators of Myc homology box I were also shown to be oncogenes and tumor suppressors.
Small molecules were demonstrated to efficiently inhibit the interaction of c-Myc with Max.
Further reading 15992821
Submitted by Maria Sunnerhagen marsu@ifm.liu.se
| |